On Tuesday 10 January 2006 17:38, Chuck Swiger wrote:

> One might be able to improve this by having "pool.ntp.org" and other
> relatively full domains (Europe, NA) be CNAMES which point to
> 0.pool.ntp.org, 1.pool.ntp.org, and so forth, which would let you spread
> the load-balancing between 30+ boxes rather than just 10...?

No.  DNS forbids having multiple CNAMEs per RR.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
featured product: the KDE desktop - http://kde.org

Attachment: pgpdLv5z2V8GO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to