On Apr 19, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Tapio Sokura wrote:
One problem with the vendor.pool.ntp.org approach is that the vendor sort of loses control of the addressess used. I'd rather see something like ntp-devicename.vendor.com used in the appliance and that would be a cname to vendor.pool.ntp.org or some other time provider the vendor wants to use.
That's really up to the vendor. All we care about is having the control on our side.
[...]
One slight problem with this cname approach is companies that go belly up, or lose control of the domain name for some other reason.
That again is the concern for the customer of $vendor, not for us. - ask -- http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/ _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
