Chuck Swiger wrote:
David J Taylor wrote:
[]
Doesn't iburst violate the "more than 5 per minute" rule?
Yes. But with the default NTP settings, it shouldn't violate the old
20 requests/hour guideline. iburst should be reserved for hosts
providing NTP services to other machines, and not used by end-client
workstations.
Time to start a different thread, perhaps.
My understanding of iburst is that it is for /any/ NTP client, whether
providing downstream services or not. Indeed, it is particular
appropriate for end-client workstations which may be up and down more than
servers, and therefore have more need of the quick synchronisation which
iburst can provide.
David
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers