On Monday 10 September 2007, you wrote: > On Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 07:5849PM -0400, Chuck wrote: > > i found several recent (in the past year) references to this problem on > > google and all agree it is not possible to bind to a single address. i cannot > > believe such a sophisticated program cannot do such a simple requirement. > > Are you compiling ntpd from source? If so, you could see if the patch > at https://support.ntp.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=836 works for you. >
actually, it is a package manager that handles the source itself but i can override it and compile/install manually. will check this out. thank you. > Also it seems there are plans to support IP address binding eventually: > https://support.ntp.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=830#c5 > cool. still, i would think it would have been one of the very first options put into it.. i guess priorities come from various experiences and needs. i don't think i have placed more than 3 servers into production with a single ip/interface in the past 15 yrs, so for me large ip lists and routing tables are the norm. :) > - Martin > -- Chuck _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
