On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:10, Jan Hoevers wrote: > It's not a matter of "not entirely accurate". > > If you're giving penalties for being 100 ms off, based on a > measurement > with a 500 ms round trip time, you'll end up giving penalties to > perfect > servers. And that's exactly what is happening here.
You missed the point. The exact score doesn't matter. Even the exact accuracy doesn't matter, as long as it follows the "rules" I setup in the other mail. As far as the pool is concerned there are only two scores "above 5" and "below 5". As long as good servers have a score above 5 and bad servers have one below 5 then the monitoring system is accurate enough. - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
