On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Kuethe wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> We limit up/download speed in apps and using wondershaper, yet still our >>> time is deemed unworthy. >> >> But have you prioritized time above all else? > > It worked without wondershaper.
as they say on icanhazcheeseburger: "ur doin it wrong" this device is definitely slowing down traffic - much more than you'd like. > And doesn't wondershaper sort exactly that kind of stuff out? It can only do what you tell it to do. not being familiar with wondershaper, i'm going to suppose it's a generic tool for controlling the order and rate at which packets flow through your box. some people might not take place the same kind of importance on udp/123 as you do... > If not, please educate us. Packet shaping and other forms of traffic engineering are not completely trivial. You are expecting this wondershaper thing to "Do What I Mean" - I've never used wondershaper so I can't say whether it will or won't or can or can't do what you want. I will also say that it took me a few tries over a few days to get my traffic management tuned properly. Now that it's nicely tuned, even with significant amount of other traffic on my DSL link, my ntp stats are pretty decent. CK -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too? _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
