On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jeff Woolsey <[email protected]> wrote:
> From the billboard you posted it looked like it hadn't been running
> long; the reaches were no more than 17. Does it look better later?
>
> My host has been running for days and a few of the jitters are over 10,
> most under, none less than 1.
well, if 'better later' means greater reach, then no ...
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
zorro.sf-bay.or 216.218.254.202 2 u 7 64 3 20.349 -304.80 129.077
+AC-NTP0.net.cmu 128.237.148.140 2 u 45 64 1 84.825 -218.96 20.964
+AC-NTP1.net.cmu 128.237.148.140 2 u 34 64 1 79.758 -243.93 21.061
+AC-NTP2.net.cmu 128.237.148.132 2 u 43 64 1 76.902 -224.66 23.739
*clock.sjc.he.ne .CDMA. 1 u 44 64 1 21.633 -217.75 18.334
but the jitters _are_ lower.
perhaps leaving it run overnight is called for here?
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
