On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 13:34 UTC, Ryan Malayter wrote:
> In the interests of sane default behavior, shouldn't there be some
> default (long) interval after which ntpd re-resolves all of its
> name-based servers and peers if they stop responding? I know the new
> "pool" keyword is supposed to do something like this, but it seems
> server and peer lines should exhibit similar behavior.

Yes it should.  I haven't done the work yet, but my plan is to extend
the mechanism used by the new "pool" implementation, which stores the
original hostname so it can re-resolve it later.  Currently,
non-pool-prototype associations store only the numeric IP address of
the peer.

Cheers,
Dave Hart
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to