Hi,

Just to follow up on this, after trying the re-keying option set to 86400, we were still seeing the intermittent tcp timeouts.

However after switching TcpOnly option to on, we have now been having reliable communication for 8 hours or so, whereas before we were getting timeouts every couple of hours.

Sop hopefully this has solved the problem, and it looks like UDP data was being dropped occasionally.

Tom

On 2013-11-28 17:57, [email protected] wrote:
OK makes sense.

How often would you expect to see the REQ_KEY and the PMTU probes occurring?

They seem to happen quite a lot, is that normal?

Tom

On 2013-11-28 15:51, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:52:45PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:

Now that debugging is turned on properly, I am seeing some
interesting lines:
2013-11-28 14:48:48 tinc.dcvpn[31620]: Got type 2 MTU probe reply 1431 from rps (2001:1b40:5000:9::2 port 655) 2013-11-28 14:48:48 tinc.dcvpn[31620]: Got type 2 MTU probe reply 1431 from rps (2001:1b40:5000:9::2 port 655) 2013-11-28 14:48:48 tinc.dcvpn[31620]: Got type 2 MTU probe reply 1431 from rps (2001:1b40:5000:9::2 port 655) 2013-11-28 14:48:48 tinc.dcvpn[31620]: rps (2001:1b40:5000:9::2 port 655) RTT 0.49 ms, burst bandwidth 51.684 Mbit/s, rx packet loss 100.00 %
Specifically the bit about 100% packet loss.
Ignore the bit about packet loss, that is an estimate that doesn't work
correctly yet.

It was shortly after following by:
2013-11-28 14:51:01 tinc.dcvpn[31620]: Got REQ_KEY from rps (2001:1b40:5000:9::2 port 55170): 15 rps rsukmhb 21 AA...
I got a REQ_KEY request 12 times in 1s from rps.
That is also normal for tinc 1.1.
_______________________________________________
tinc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
_______________________________________________
tinc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
_______________________________________________
tinc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc

Reply via email to