On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:53:36PM +0100, Flynn Marquardt wrote: > > Could it be that the Subnet declaration was on the last line of the > > file? There is a bug in 1.0.13 (fixed in 1.0.14) that causes it to > > ignore the last line of a config file if it doesn't end with a newline > > character. You might have fixed it when you replaced it with two /9 > > Subnets. If so, try changing it back to one /8 again. > I also thought on this potential source of problem (other daemons do > often have this problem too) > and already moved the line up - it did not help ...
Hm, I just checked myself and tinc 1.0.13 seems to accept /8 Subnets
just fine. Can you reproduce it and send me an exact copy of the config
file containing the /8 Subnet?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tinc mailing list [email protected] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinc
