tinycc-devel  

Messages by Thread

• [Tinycc-devel] Very Serious bus in TCC Alexy via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Very Serious bus in TCC Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Very Serious bus in TCC Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Very Serious bus in TCC Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Serious bugs in TCC continue Alexy via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Serious bugs in TCC continue Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Serious bugs in TCC continue Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Serious bugs in TCC continue Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] SIGSEV inside decl_initializer daemon via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] SIGSEV inside decl_initializer daemon via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Some TLS problems Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Some TLS problems Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] bounds-checker and backtrace runtime James Mills via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bounds-checker and backtrace runtime Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bounds-checker and backtrace runtime James Mills via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [mob] Fix qualifiers on const/volatile array struct members Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Unexpected warning assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type Patrick Pelissier
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unexpected warning assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc1.c missing ___mzerodf/__mzerosf constants after commit 30afb50 Waqas Tahir
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] BUG: libtcc1.c missing ___mzerodf/__mzerosf constants after commit 30afb50 Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Comments on riscv64 clear cache commit Sam Ellicott
• [Tinycc-devel] Changing std to C99? Meng Zhuo
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changing std to C99? Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? J Mastron via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Charlie Gordon
  • [Tinycc-devel] summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Aleksandar Kuktin
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: Re: Re: Re: summary - Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Liam Wilson
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Urs Janßen via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • [Tinycc-devel] [typo correction] Re: historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? arnold
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Sam Ellicott
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] code of conduct (was ...bootstrapping...) gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Aleksandar Kuktin
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] historical patchset for tcc-0.9.26 - Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Ivo van Poorten
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] bootstrapping gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] bootstrapping Aleksandar Kuktin
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [OT] bootstrapping gz8cx4
  • [Tinycc-devel] integrity - Re: [OT] bootstrapping Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] preview patches for tcc-0.9.27 and pnut-exe Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [OT] Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
  • [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping perspectives - Re: [OT] Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] bootstrapping perspectives - Re: [OT] Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? gz8cx4
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: pack named stack arguments per Apple AArch64 ABI Matt Weichselbaum
• [Tinycc-devel] win32: avoid Interlocked imports for tcc arm64 Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: avoid Interlocked imports for tcc arm64 grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: avoid Interlocked imports for tcc arm64 Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] win32: small robustness and PE hardening improvements Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] win32: use VirtualAlloc for tccrun memory Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: use VirtualAlloc for tccrun memory grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: use VirtualAlloc for tccrun memory Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: use VirtualAlloc for tccrun memory grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] win32: use VirtualAlloc for tccrun memory Mounir IDRASSI via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Re : (no subject) david . koch
• [Tinycc-devel] [patch]fix asm parse directive zero pad logic Jerry Jin
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [patch]fix asm parse directive zero pad logic grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [patch]fix asm parse directive zero pad logic Jerry Jin
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [patch]fix asm parse directive zero pad logic grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [patch]fix asm parse directive zero pad logic Jerry Jin
• [Tinycc-devel] -run bug with destructor ordering Reini Urban
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] -run bug with destructor ordering grischka via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] support qbe asm for loops Jerry Jin
  • [Tinycc-devel] support qbe asm for loops Jerry Jin
• [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? Ellie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? gz8cx4
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? Sam Ellicott
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? Reini Urban
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? Charles Lohr
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Guidelines regarding LLM code? gz8cx4
• [Tinycc-devel] How do I compile for a target system on a mounted partition? broke
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] How do I compile for a target system on a mounted partition? Brian Mayer
• [Tinycc-devel] x86_64-gen: fix missing REX prefix for xor zero into r8-r15 Cyan Ogilvie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] x86_64-gen: fix missing REX prefix for xor zero into r8-r15 grischka via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] x86_64 incorrect argument passing ABI for mixed structures lemon --- via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Доля Денис
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Доля Денис
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Charles Lohr
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm64: minimal freestanding inline asm support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Daniil Gusev
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Fix wchar_t definition for FreeBSD/arm64 in tccdefs.h Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
• [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Ellie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Michael Hewitt via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website Ellie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] regarding the tinycc website John Mastronardo via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Tinycc bugs Aniruddhan Murali
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tinycc bugs noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Windows ARM64 support Benjamin Oldenburg via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Windows ARM64 support noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Windows ARM64 support grischka via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] fix(riscv64-asm): use %c for unknown constraint in error message Weixie Cui via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] fix(riscv64-asm): use %c for unknown constraint in error message Weixie Cui via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] patch for -MT option tccq via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] tcc miscompiles binutils 2.46 BFD mmap code path Jamie Magee
• [Tinycc-devel] Fixed-Point AI Runtime: Scaling 1.1B Inference via Pure Python Q4.12 Simulation Dhoko ID
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] riscv64-link: pair pcrel lo relocations by hi address Nav Dian
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap tccq via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed - Re: tinycc/os Was: missing roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed tccq via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] qemu-0.14.1-hotfix.patch - Re: qemu and tcc Was: missing roadmap QEMU compilation with i386-tcc passed Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Eyal Rozenberg via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Eyal Rozenberg via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • [Tinycc-devel] release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] Re : release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap david . koch
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] __thread - Re : release tag criteria - Re: Re : Re: Re : The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] The project seems to be missing a new release and/or a roadmap noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Implement ARM64 assembler Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 2/3] asm: Pass ASMOperand to asm_subst_operand backend Aleksi Hannula
  • [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm64-link: Implement TSTBR and CONDBR relocs Aleksi Hannula
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM64 assembler grischka via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag - RESOLVED Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target Zach van Rijn
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target Sam Ellicott
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • [Tinycc-devel] 128bit datatypes - Re: Unable to compile for riscv64 target Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] 128bit datatypes - Re: Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Unable to compile for riscv64 target noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Protocol for contributing code and documentation. zebbediah beck
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Protocol for contributing code and documentation. Sam Ellicott
• [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Update about weird behavior with -o flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [solution] error: section type conflict: .note.GNU-stack, 01 <> 07 Mike via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Is there a way to suppress warnings? Simon Sobisch
• [Tinycc-devel] Weird behavior with using -o flag versus running the source immediately with -run flag Stefanos via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Apropos cross-build tcc grischka via Tinycc-devel
• Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. zebbediah beck
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] Contributing comments in code. Bruno Castro
• [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures grischka via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] aligment x86, arm and structures Michael Ackermann via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] slight refactor on x86_64 backend Anon
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] slight refactor on x86_64 backend Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] FreeBSD Unable to build release 0_9_27 Raphael O. via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] FreeBSD Unable to build release 0_9_27 noneofyourbusiness via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? spader via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Eric Raible
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? Cyan Ogilvie
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] anyone interested in a small patch for outputting relocated ELFs to memory for jitted debugging? spader via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix va_arg stack alignment for 16-byte aligned types Dylan Fei
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect address calculation for symbols with large addends Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect address calculation for symbols with large addends Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel
• [Tinycc-devel] Missing library function in winapi-full-for-0.9.27.zip 椎名 林檎
• [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Dylan Fei
  • Re: [Tinycc-devel] [BUG] [PATCH] aarch64: Fix incorrect unsigned division for pointer difference (TOK_PDIV) Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel

• Earlier messages