Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Le mardi 24 janvier 2012 01:11:08, Daniel Glöckner a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:30:54AM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Shouldn't the same fix (Cf attached file) be applied for x86-64?
Yes you are right, x86-64 needs fixing as well.
As I'm not sure about the answer I didn't dare to commit the change.
It needs to be modified a little, as load gets called with registers
not covered in reg_classes.
I hope I understand what you meant well. Does this new patch fix the problem?
I think it can't hurt here to quote this one:
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
Interpreted version: Before you even start to write some patch, make
sure you have a test to prove its correctness.
--- grischka
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
