Le mardi 24 janvier 2012 13:10:23, grischka a écrit : > Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > Le mardi 24 janvier 2012 01:11:08, Daniel Glöckner a écrit : > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:30:54AM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > >>> Shouldn't the same fix (Cf attached file) be applied for x86-64? > >> > >> Yes you are right, x86-64 needs fixing as well. > >> > >>> As I'm not sure about the answer I didn't dare to commit the change. > >> > >> It needs to be modified a little, as load gets called with registers > >> not covered in reg_classes. > > > > I hope I understand what you meant well. Does this new patch fix the > > problem? > > I think it can't hurt here to quote this one: > > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan Nice quote indeed :) > > Interpreted version: Before you even start to write some patch, make > sure you have a test to prove its correctness. Don't worry, that's what I do before committing. I just had little time for that and sent this patch in the hope it could be useful. If nobody else do it I'll test and commit a valid fix whenever I find time. > > --- grischka
Best regards, Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
