Le mercredi 13 février 2013 19:08:37, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : > Le mercredi 13 février 2013 17:16:28, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit : > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:30:14 -0700, arn...@skeeve.com wrote: > > > "Thomas Preud'homme" <robo...@celest.fr> wrote: > > >> Why not but strike multiarch from that as I don't see how we could > > >> detect it by compiling a C program. > > > > > > Use the output of ldd to tell you where the C library is. > > > > Yep true, I thought about it last night and forgot about it in the > > morning. However I just pushed a commit using checking where is crti.o > > before reading your mail. It's a one line test so I think the solution > > is not too bad but you can prove me wrong of course. > > Thanks a lot for the suggestion. Thinking about it a bit I managed to come > up with a much better patch. It's not totally done though but I have to > leave. I'll push it tonight. Stay tuned.
Pushed. And the diffstat from the original situation (before my 2 commits to reorganize) is also better. See for yourself: % git diff --stat 05108a3b0a8eff70739b253b8995999b1861f9f2 f9ac2013779370e0d010922ae3684e601e53aa1d Makefile | 10 ---------- configure | 16 ++++++++++++++++ tcc.h | 8 -------- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Thomas Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
