Sia, That patch is not applied to mob. The whole point of this email thread is that we are discussing the contribution, and helping jiang produce a patch that includes a discussion, meaningful comments, and many small commits.
I fail to see how this "direction" for tcc is a bad one. :-) David On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Sia Lang <silverlangu...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's another long and obscure patch with zero discussions about the > approach upfront and no explanation whatsoever what the patch does and how > it solves the problem. > > I really really dislike where tcc is going and I no longer trust it as our > C compiler backend. > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:37 AM, jiang <30155...@qq.com> wrote: > >> my patch: See Attachment >> You look at, if no problem, I'll push mob >> >> Jiang >> >> 在 2014年07月30日 00:00, tinycc-devel-requ...@nongnu.org 写道: >> >> Gcc and msvc are correct. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: tinycc-devel-bounces+michael=theessentialexchange....@nongnu.org >> [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+michael=theessentialexchange....@nongnu.org >> <tinycc-devel-bounces+michael=theessentialexchange....@nongnu.org>] On >> Behalf Of jiang >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:37 PM >> To: Thomas Preud'homme >> Cc: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org >> Subject: [Tinycc-devel] 回复: tcc grammar problems >> >> I am sorry, I do not have expressed good I mean. I want you sure, is tcc >> correct or gcc msvc correctly. If the gcc msvc correct, I want to fix it. >> >> Best regards >> Jiang >> >> Thomas Preud'homme <robo...@celest.fr> <robo...@celest.fr>编写： >> >> >> >Le dimanche 13 juillet 2014, 22:12:39 jiang a écrit : >> >> >> Hello everyone!>> >> (s->a = (s->b = (s->c = n + 4)));>> >> >> gcc & >> msvc:>> --> 30 / 30 / 126 // Because the return value is left>> >> >> tcc>> >> --> 254 / 30 / 126 // Because the return is the right value >> >> >>Since it works for the last two values I don't think it's that. It >> >simply looks like tcc compute n + 4 (254) and then tries to store it in >> >each field independently. It's a folding issue. Tcc records 254 in a >> >CValue associated with the SValue for n + 4. The problem is how this is >> >propagated (folded) to the three field access.> >> >> >> >> Shall tcc assignment modify what? Same with gcc&msvc. >> >> >>Yes, gcc and msvc are definitely right here.>>Best regards,>>Thomas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tinycc-devel mailing >> listTinycc-devel@nongnu.orghttps://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tinycc-devel mailing list >> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
