Larry Doolittle wrote:
Friends -
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:49:23AM +0200, Christian Jullien wrote:
Arf! You're right.
That why I never fix warning in a code which is not mine.
My fix proposal is definitively better.
Sorry, everyone, testing should have caught my original mistake.
I committed a fix.
The real equivalence is between the original "s" + (i<2)
and &"s"[i<2].
If people are going to use clang more likely, can't you add something
to configure for clang to turn off some silly warnings?
That would be USEFUL, for example ;)
--- gr
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
