On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, grischka wrote:
I like it. More lines removed than added could mean that it is going in the right direction anyway ;)
Hehe :)
Question: I wonder whether now we could maybe get rid of the asm label "post-processing" (asm_free_labels) and the asm_label stack altogether?
That requires surgery in how linking is done (in a sense moving that post-processing from asm symbols from compilation to linking time). I believe this ultimately will be good anyway, as there are currently various strangenesses and corner cases that are buggy especially involving multi-file compilation (i.e. without intermediate .o files), or multi-file -run. I think I'll work on that somewhen the next days, but it'll be a bit hairy and potentially disruptive, so the release doesn't have to wait. In the meantime ...
Seen that it can be counter-productive too, as with for example:
...
$ tcc -c t1.c t2.c && tcc t1.o t2.o -o t.exe && t.exe tcc: error: undefined symbol 'x5' $ tcc -c t1.c && objdump -x t1.o SYMBOL TABLE: 00000000 l df *ABS* 00000000 t1.c 0000004a l .text 0000001f x5 Here 'x5' should have the g[lobal] binding from C.
... I have fixed this in mob with a one-liner instead :) Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
