Hi Christian, I should have mentioned- my unmodified sqlite build was with these headers (linked somewhere on the official site): http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/tinycc/winapi-full-for-0.9.27.zip
I'm also unsure why these are distributed separately/what the rights situation is. It would definitely be nice to clear that up and bundle them with the next release if possible. - Jonathan On Tue, 1 Jan 2019, 07:29 Christian Jullien <eli...@orange.fr wrote: > Thanks Michael and Jonathan. > > Unless I’m missing something in flag or config, sqlite does not compile > ROOTB. > > I add to include this dirty patch in sqlite3.c > > > > int MultiByteToWideChar(void); > > int WideCharToMultiByte(void); > > #define CP_ACP 0 > > #define CP_UTF8 65001 > > #define CP_OEMCP 1 > > > > In fact, missing declarations are in standard winnls.h Windows header > which does not exists in tcc distrib and is explicitly removed (by > Grischka?) from windows.h > > > > Line 70: //gr #include <winnls.h> > > > > Which winnls.h have we the rights to include in standard tcc distrib? > > We could take the one from MinGW but includes many others includes not > present in tcc (should we take them all in tcc standard distrib?). > > The ones from PellsC/Watcom/lcc are lighter but I’ve no ideas if we have > the rights to do so. > > > > A quick and dirty solution would be to include winnsl.h with only > definitions required to compile sqlite and let other people complete this > first version with other declaration. > > > > Wdyt? > > > > > > *From:* Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis= > orange...@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Newman > *Sent:* mardi 1 janvier 2019 00:25 > *To:* tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > *Subject:* Re: [Tinycc-devel] Function pointers declared in a particular > way result in a miscompilation > > > > Many thanks Michael! I can confirm SQLite now compiles correctly on win32. > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 21:06, Michael Matz <matz....@frakked.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Jonathan Newman wrote: > > > Hi,This seems to be the issue causing SQLite compilation to fail (or at > > least part of it/related to it). > > > > When a function pointer is declared in a particular way, it seems that > > __stdcall (and presumably other attributes?) are ignored. As a result, > TCC > > thinks the function is caller-cleanup when it is not, and the stack gets > > "cleaned" twice. > > > > See the full test case attached. As a quick summary, > > > > This works: > > ((int __stdcall (*)(int, int, int))some_stdcall_func) (2, 0, 0); > > > > And so does this: > > ((int(*__stdcall)(int, int, int))some_stdcall_func) (3, 0, 0); > > > > But this fails: > > ((int(__stdcall*)(int, int, int))some_stdcall_func) (4, 0, 0); > > Aha, thanks for the investigation and testcase, that really helps. This > particular problem is now fixed on trunk. Lacking win32 I can't > check if it completely fixes SQLite, but at least your testcase works when > cross compiled and run under wine. > > > Ciao, > Michael. > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
