On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:35 PM Christian Jullien <eli...@orange.fr> wrote: > > IMHO, > > The right solution is to start to implement C11 features and surround them > with right #if _STDC_VERSION >= xxx. > This is how gcc/Linux handle differences between C/C++/POSIX/... > > Even gcc is not totally fair when it claims it supports a given version. > > I spent several hours to figure out why my -std=c++11 regexp always returned > false with gcc 4.8.2 until I discovered that <regexp> and all API was > present ... BUT NOT IMPLEMENTED and all calls where returning error!!! > > I personally vote in favor of -std=c11 new option which supports ... only > what is actually implemented (without complex for instance). > > What other maintainers think about by opinion? >
I'm not a maintainer, but am totally in favor to add a support for -std=C11 and maybe latter for -std=C99. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
