> On 21 Jun 2019, at 14:56, Christian Jullien <eli...@orange.fr> wrote: > > This is a valuable check but IMHO, it should be controlled by -Wformat (as > GNU gcc) and set of false by default. > Otherwise, I suspect tcc users will have a lot a new warnings.
I'm not implementing a new warning in TCC. I am only ensuring, by following C11 7.21.6.1:8 to the letter, that the TCC source code passes the strictest such checks that a C compiler could have, and also that a very exotic C compiler does not produce a non-functional binary when compiling TCC. Considering the amount of code that good warnings represent, I think that a C compiler can either be tiny, or provide helpful warnings. The patches I have been sending, including the last one, only make TCC not exhibit undefined behavior, a more manageable goal that only requires small changes and do not make TCC significantly larger. Pascal _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
