Christian Jullien wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi Christian,
gcc: error: this compiler does not support arm64 <= Sad
Grischka, can you please reconsider this choice as it seems dangerous to me to ignore argument? Please note that my error message was the same as gcc.
I did make considerations of course and I think the conclusion was that this is category "fragmentary feature". The error message may be the same as with gcc but all the rest required to make it a feature useful for other people is absent. There was some aspect of "unnecessarily different" too. tcc -hh already has a list the ignored options, there was no need to add an extra line explaining that -arch is ignored now too. It may be arguable how user-friendly or "dangerous" tcc is with how it ignores some options, however I do not see the argument to handle specifically this one differently. Rsp. arguments always exist of course but do they justify the extra effort, that is the consideration to be made. --- grischka
C.
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
