I vote yes.It is the time for a new release. On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:39:43AM +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > <html><body><br/>The last tcc release is very old, <br/>and tcc has received > many fixes and new features since then.<br/><br/><br/>What are the plans for > a new release?<br/><br/><br/>I vote for a 0.9.28 rc with the current > features, <br/>see, what simple fixes are possible <br/>and then make a > release in the next weeks.<br/>(Would help distros to include a recent > tcc)<br/><br/>Afterwarde prepare for tcc 1.0 later this year.<br/>That would > make it possible for distros to add<br/>tcc 1.0 in there spring/LTS > releases.<br/><br/>Unfortunately, we missed the 20. anniversary for tcc > 1.0<br/>(first commit: 27. Oct. 2001),<br/>but releasing at the 21. > anniversary is still possible.<br/><br/><br/>For 1.0, i vote for fixing more > bugs and verified C99 support, <br/>either excluding Complex math or > <br/>with optional Complex math <br/>(enable during configure, but defaults > 'off')<br/><br/>tcc already understand some C11 features<br/>and > newer extensions (example: __has_include)<br/>but the related implementation > <br/>is missing or buggy (_Atomic)<br/><br/>I would see fixes for C11 things > as 'cool, when working', <br/>but optional for tcc 1.0.<br/><br/>What > are you think?<br/><br/><br/><br/>-- <br/>Regards, > Detlef<br/><br/></body></html>
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel