On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 08:28:25PM +0200, grischka wrote: > BUT: tinycc does have a mission that gcc does not have, which is to be > fast and simple. So I guess it will have to make some restrictions > to the feature as to what extend it can be supported sensibly.
+1 > For example tinycc could require at least same basenames (as in the reported > case). Which would reduce drastically the number of possible candidates > and still would work for all purposes of #pragma once except when 'b.h' is > a link to 'a.h' and both are used in the same translation unit. +1 /tccm _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
