Hi, On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 03:54:45PM +0100, grischka wrote: > On 12.03.2025 13:00, Alejandro Colomar via Tinycc-devel wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm proposing a set of operators for ISO C2y: _Widthof, _Minof, _Maxof. > > Someone wondered if it might be more work for small compilers like TCC, > > for little benefit. So I'd like you to read the GCC bug linked below > > and comment if you want. > > > > In the spirit of "One In, One Out": > > Where is the feature(s) that you would suggest to remove instead?
I have a list of features that I'd like to remove:
- static in array parameters
void f(int a[static 3]);
- 0 as a null pointer constant
void *p = 0;
- Redeclaration of functions with array parameters of a different size
void f(int a[3]);
void f(int a[4]);
(and probably more that I don't remember at the moment.)
But none of those are related to this. Do you have any suggestions?
Have a lovely day!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
