Thank you for the hint, but the purpose is still getting it compilable by outdated compilers, right ?
How would live-bootstrapping a system based on unsecure compilers, open to unpatched attacks, be relevant ? But from the coding style perspective, I'm all for it... Regards. ----- Mail d'origine ----- De: Urs Janßen via Tinycc-devel <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Cc: Urs Janßen <[email protected]> Envoyé: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: bootstrapping - Re: Changing std to C99? [email protected] wrote: > You mean obsolete compilers (C89 and below) that are producing bad quality > code anyway by today standards ? JFTR: <https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/CodingStyle> | TCC is mostly implemented in C90. Do not use any non-C90 features | that are not already in use. // comments are C99 _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
