A Dilluns, 6 de juliol de 2009, [email protected] va escriure:
> I'm not very far along myself and I've been using the gtk client
> exclusively. The current version built and installed cleanly and seemed
> about the same speed as the gtk client over all. Some things faster, some
> slower -- subjectively -- I didn't measure anything and any difference was
> slight anyhow.
>
> Looks much nicer of course, because it matches the rest of a kde desktop
> ;-)
>
> koo.rc could use a dot in front of it.

Sure. Renamed to .koorc which seems much more standard.

> Layout isn't quite the same, stretched one of my views a little vertically.
> That container has 6 cols, the name string and widget are supposed to use
> only 4 followed by a new line. Maybe it expects only four cols?

That's something I need to fix. It's the same problem with attachments view. 
The problem is with the tabs below which should expand and they're currently 
not doing it.

> Sorry, that's as much as I can test it really. I've done some pyKDE in the
> past so I know you've done one heck of a lot of work on this too! Very
> nice. I really miss signals/slots and validators... I'll definitely be
> coming back to koo in the end.
>
> http://gemlog.ca/test/kooVsGtkLayout.png
>
> ------------------------
> Regards, Paul Evans
>
>
>
>
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
>
> --
> http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=39025#39025
>
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyerp-users mailing list
> http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users


-- 
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Mòbil: +34 669 40 40 18
_______________________________________________
Tinyerp-users mailing list
http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users

Reply via email to