Ok, done. Please check that it works for you. Miklos On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Morten Tranberg Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok sounds good. I agree, defining what's a good link is radio specific. > > Morten. > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Miklos Maroti <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Morten, >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Morten Tranberg Hansen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Miklos, >>> >>> Is there a reason why the radios stacks using rfxlink layers does not >>> provide the LinkPacketMetadata interface? >>> The interface is used by CTP as a white bit. >> >> Good catch, I did not know of this. Actually, I see only a single use >> in lib/net/4bitle, but this should be supported. >> >>> I've attached a diff showing how it could be supported for the CC2420X >>> stack. >> >> I am thinking if this should be supported by a generic layer (compare >> link quality to a predefined value), but probably this is not a good >> idea, since there could be radios that have no LQI and there you have >> to monitor the RSSI and compare it to the background noise (I guess). >> Also, I have no sane LQI values for RF230 and other chips though. >> >> I will apply your patch (and set some values for RF230). >> >> Miklos >> >>> >>> Morten. >>> >>> -- >>> Morten Hansen, http://mortent.dk >>> >> > > > > -- > Morten Hansen, http://mortent.dk >
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-devel
