On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Matt Welsh wrote: > This seems like an unnecessarily large swath of the AM address space > for one small working group. It would be better to justify this in > terms of your actual needs, rather than projected. How many AM IDs do > the net2 protocols currently need and can we estimate the growth in > the protocol space over the next few years based on past trends?
The idea was that since net2 is technically responsible for protocols sitting on top of AM, it's the WG responsible for preventing confusion and collisions in the AM identifier space. So really, the way to see this is "protocols in the TinyOS tree use this range." Phil _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
