On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Matt Welsh wrote: > OK, this is fine enough, though I guess it means that the net2 WG is > the gatekeeper for all protocols in TinyOS. It wasn't clear to me > that this was the case...
Well, I'd hope it's not. net2 is responsible for assigning the IDs, not necessarily deciding whether a protocol should in in tinyos-2.x; that would be up to the WG responsible for the code. E.g., as has come up in the past, one could imagine a working group forming around a protocol family. >> Sure. My question was how AM IDs in the reserved range are reclaimed. I'd think when the code leaves tinyos-2.x? As long as the code is in the tree, the ID will be needed... so it's up to a WG when to garbage- collect a protocol it doesn't want to support any more. Phil _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
