Miklos Maroti ha scritto: > You need much better. Can you record one with 0.1 ms resolution?
Hi Miklos. This morning I made a new analysis by the oscilloscope. I tried two resolution: 0.5ms/DIV and 0.1ms/DIV. Unfortunately nothing has changed compared to the previous test. These are the photos during transmission with the "0.5ms/DIV" resolution: http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/2664/dsc0768d.jpg http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/9052/dsc0770o.jpg With the "0.1ms/DIV" resolution I could not take pictures because of the high frequency, however the result was the same. The following picture is a photo with a "2.5s/DIV" resolution, just to watch the entire transmissions: http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8413/dsc0766z.jpg So... Where is the backoff? Even if it were equal to 2 ms, with the "0.5ms/DIV" resolution (or "0.1ms/DIV" resolution) I should see it, but this didn't happen. I'm totally confused. Thanks, -- Francesco Ficarola <francesco.ficarola_at_gmail_dot_com> [GPG KeyID: 0xDBA99D92]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
