Hi Francesco! What are you measuring? How are you measuring it?
Miklos On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Francesco Ficarola <[email protected]> wrote: > Miklos Maroti ha scritto: >> You need much better. Can you record one with 0.1 ms resolution? > > Hi Miklos. This morning I made a new analysis by the oscilloscope. I > tried two resolution: 0.5ms/DIV and 0.1ms/DIV. Unfortunately nothing has > changed compared to the previous test. > > These are the photos during transmission with the "0.5ms/DIV" resolution: > http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/2664/dsc0768d.jpg > http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/9052/dsc0770o.jpg > > With the "0.1ms/DIV" resolution I could not take pictures because of the > high frequency, however the result was the same. > > The following picture is a photo with a "2.5s/DIV" resolution, just to > watch the entire transmissions: > http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8413/dsc0766z.jpg > > So... Where is the backoff? Even if it were equal to 2 ms, with the > "0.5ms/DIV" resolution (or "0.1ms/DIV" resolution) I should see it, but > this didn't happen. I'm totally confused. > > Thanks, > -- > Francesco Ficarola <francesco.ficarola_at_gmail_dot_com> > [GPG KeyID: 0xDBA99D92] > > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
