Sure, it`s widely used in multiobjective optimisation be it GAs or other evolutionary algorithms. I read the table of numbers as being two columns for the 2 objectives, and 11 rows for best GA results so far? Just trying to understand the optimisation problem, as my background is in optimisation :-)
Chris Brooks Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad Michael Schippling <sc...@santafe.edu> wrote: > OK, this is for my own amusement only... > > What the heck are you guys talking about? > > By "pareto front" do you mean the, slowly, > improving set of values discovered by the GA? > I've only heard pareto optimum in game theory, > not GA's, but it seems to fit. > > If that list of numbers is meant to represent > X-Y locations for nodes, they plot out to be > along the two axes. That doesn't seem to be > very optimal for coverage of a 2-D area. > > I will be of no use in testing, but I believe > TOSSIM allows one to specify locations in its > setup files, so you should be able to plug them > in with appropriate scaling. > > And I guess the insertion of telephone # links > was a feature of someone's iPhone having a little > fun with it's users? > > MS > > Not sent from no iPone or nuthin like it > > > Chris Brooks wrote: >> So are those values lying on the pareto front found by the GA? I >> think we need more info to figure out what you are trying to >> accomplish! For a start, what were the design variables of your >> optimisation? >> >> >> >> >> Chris Brooks >> >> Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad >> >> Michael Schippling <sc...@santafe.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >>> uh... what are those values of? secondarily, why do some of them >>> seem to show as telephone numbers? >>> >>> MS >>> >>> T O wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm that i am optimising, >>>> the algorithm outputs the values below. The first objective is >>>> maximising the efficiency of the network by lowering energy >>>> depletion(minimising energy depletion) and the second is >>>> maximising the number of nodes to achieve full coverage. >>>> >>>> 0.943164 0.000163251 <tel:0.000163251> 0.000346453 >>>> <tel:0.000346453> 0.254052 0.583485 0.000419807 <tel:0.000419807> >>>> 0.289261 0.000633636 <tel:0.000633636> 0.896291 0.000314365 >>>> <tel:0.000314365> 0.100863 0.000900134 <tel:0.000900134> >>>> 0.000730138 <tel:0.000730138> 0.179723 0.0010259 0.0163291 >>>> 0.0509728 0.00154449 0.000590426 <tel:0.000590426> 0.248574 >>>> 0.00175349 0.001788 >>>> >>>> So from the output values above I wanted to simulate a wireless >>>> sensor network. >>>> >>>> If you could help me with this it would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help >>>> mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu >>>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing >>> list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu >>> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing >> list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu >> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@millennium.berkeley.edu https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help