> The whole issue of platform dependence on issues such as byte packing > (between motes and TOSSIM, for example, were it to run on a Motorola > instead of an Intel) has raised the question of whether nesC should > have a message type. Field accesses would be transformed into the right > packing/unpacking operations. There would be some limitations over > standard structs (e.g., no taking pointers). The idea is to do it at > the language level, instead of through components. Once you do this, > all of the buffer management issues go away.
Right - that is *exactly* what I am advocating. M. _______________________________________________ Tinyos-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.Millennium.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-users
