On 12/13/2016 10:08 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: >> About wakeup skb number, probably we can make it smarter, for example, >> > its value can be decided by link window size and the size of available >> > backlog queue or something else. As the value is an important factor for >> > us, I suggest it's worth considering more. > Sure we can make it smarter, but I don't see why you see this figure as > important. This is just an "emergency brake" in case the wakeup queue is very > long. > If we have failed to find a user to wake up more than ten times it is very > likely that all relevant levels are congested, and it is meaningless and a > waste of CPU to continue. Note that the iterator is NOT stepped when we find > a user to wake up. >
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, you are right. Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com> > Regards > ///jon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tipc-discussion mailing list tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
