Some of you may find this interesting.
jim

FRONTLINE Bulletin
http://www.pbs.org/frontline/


- This Week: "Did Daddy Do It?," Apr. 25 at 9:00pm (WTTW) on PBS
- Inside Frontline: An e-mail dispatch from producer Michael
Kirk
- Live Discussion: A chat with the producer, Fri. at 11 a.m. EDT

----------------------------

+ This week ...

As Americans know all too well these days, the sexual abuse of
children is
not an easy subject to broach. Still harder is to call into
question the
testimony of vulnerable minors and the integrity of experts and
prosecutors
who believe that they are protecting children from unspeakable
crimes.

But this week FRONTLINE examines a period in the 1980s when
prosecutors and
the public were swept up in a panic, fueled in part by the
media, that led
to dozens of infamous convictions for child-molestation in
day-care centers
around the country. Now, nearly 20 years later, an in-depth
re-examination
of one particular case calls into question the methods of those
who pursued
these cases so zealously.

In "Did Daddy Do It?," this Thursday night Apr. 25 at 9:00pm
(WTTW),
FRONTLINE producer Michael Kirk and correspondent Peter J. Boyer
tell the
story of Frank Fuster, a Cuban immigrant who in 1984 was living
in the
suburban Miami neighborhood of Country Walk when he and his
young wife,
Ileana, were charged with sexually abusing more than 20 children
at their
home day-care center. Fuster -- who had prior convictions for
manslaughter
and child molestation -- was branded a "monster" by the local
media and
was convicted and sentenced to 165 years in prison, where he
remains today.

Fuster's case was significant because it established the "Miami
Method" of
prosecuting day-care abuse cases. This method -- which was
copied
nationwide -- involved having "child experts" elicit videotaped
testimony
from young children.

The Fuster case also boosted the political fortunes of Florida's
state
attorney at the time, Janet Reno. But FRONTLINE's investigation
reveals new
evidence that undermines the seemingly ironclad case against
Fuster,
including new allegations by Fuster's former wife that she was
personally
pressured by Reno to testify falsely against her husband.

On our website following the broadcast we'll offer more details
on the
stories of Frank and Ileana Fuster, a closer look at the
controversy over
the techniques of interviewing children about sexual abuse, and
much more.
You'll find it all at http://www.pbs.org/frontline/

We hope you'll join us.

Wen Stephenson Website Managing Editor
FRONTLINE

This program will be rebroadcast at the following time(s):
Apr. 28 at 11:00pm (WTTW)


----------------------------

+ Inside Frontline ...

[We asked FRONTLINE producer Michael Kirk how the Fuster story
came to his
attention, and to elaborate on the "Miami Method" developed by
Florida
prosecutors in the 1980s to go after alleged child molesters.
This method
also figured in the cases of Grant Snowden and Bobby Fijnje,
which Kirk
reported on in FRONTLINE's 1998 "The Child Terror." See
http://www.pbs.org/frontline/shows/terror/ ]

. . . .

Several years ago we began researching a program about the panic
that
surrounded allegations of what is known as "multiple victim
child abuse."
Many of these cases were alleged to have happened in day-care
centers.  We
came to the conclusion that Miami was a kind of "ground zero"
for these
cases, so we began investigating stories there. We discovered
the Frank
Fuster case, known as "Country Walk," and the role played by
State Attorney
Janet Reno, the child "specialists" Joseph and Laurie Braga, and
the local
media. The more we looked at the details of this story, the more
we became
convinced that it and two others (Grant Snowden and Bobby
Fijnje) provided
the story trajectory we're always after.

The Fuster case was the first that employed what we call the
"Miami
Method." The prosecutors had learned that they would need
multiple
witnesses, speaking in unison about the details of an allegation
of abuse.
They devised, with the help of the Bragas, a method of
extracting
information from the children and videotaping that testimony. A
state law
was changed to allow the children to testify by closed-circuit
television
from the judge's chambers. The method also required physical
evidence, and
in the Fuster case that was the allegation that Fuster's son
Noel had
gonorrhea of the throat. Finally, the method called for an adult
eyewitness, which in Fuster's case was the testimony of his
wife, Ileana.

On the heels of the Fuster case, the method was applied to the
successful
retrial of police officer Grant Snowden. Snowden had been
previously
charged with child molestation but was acquitted when a jury
seemed not to
believe the young girl who made the allegation. The so-called
"Miami
Method" actually grew, in large measure, out of the lessons
prosecutors
learned from the first Snowden case.

The Bobby Fijnje case grew out of allegations by members of a
church who
believed that 14-year-old Bobby, one of the church babysitters,
was
molesting their children while they worshipped in an upstairs
sanctuary.
The "Miami Method" was again employed -- and by now the media in
Miami were
having a field day with the stories of ritual sexual abuse.
(There were
charges of satanic rituals and other outrageous reports.) The
prosecutors
charged 14-year-old Bobby as an adult, and he was held in a
juvenile
detention center for two years before his trial began. Fijnje's
lawyers
attacked the experts who elicited the testimony from the
children. When the
jury found Bobby Fijnje not guilty, the child-abuse fever in
Miami seemed
to break.

So these three cases represent the trajectory of the "multiple
victim child
abuse" story. The fact that Grant Snowden was released by an
appeals court
and that Bobby Fijnje was acquitted means that of the three
stories Frank
Fuster's has yet to be revisited -- which is why we have chosen
to
emphasize his story in our broadcast.

--Michael Kirk

----------------------------

+ Live Discussion ...

Join producer Michael Kirk on Friday, April 26, at 11 a.m. EDT,
for a
Washingtonpost.com Live Online discussion.

For details, see:
http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/zforum/02/tv_frontline042602.htm

... or check FRONTLINE's website following the broadcast:
http://www.pbs.org/frontline/shows/fuster/

----------------------------

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS
viewers.
National sponsorship of FRONTLINE is provided by EarthLink and
NPR.

----------------------------

We're always happy to hear from our viewers. If you have a
question or
comment about a FRONTLINE program, about our website, or about
this
bulletin, you can write to us directly by going to:
http://www.pbs.org/frontline/contact/


----------------------------
FRONTLINE
http://www.pbs.org/frontline/

You are subscribed to this email as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If
you wish to
unsubscribe please visit http://www.pbs.org/frontline/join/ and
fill out
the unsubscribe form.  Due to the high amount of traffic we
cannot process
unsubscribe requests by email.







_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to