Actually the study involved peanuts shelled and unshelled and normal versus overweight subjects. I don't have the reference handy but you might try those search words;
I don't think pistachios as as easy to shell. What theoretical reason is motivating your extension of the original study? Annette Quoting michael sylvester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I can remember reading about a study where some subjects ate > peanuts (unshelled) and some subjects ate peanuts but they had > to take the shells off.The conclusion was that those subjects who > had to take the shells off ate less than the other subjects. > Does anyone have the reference for this? > I am trying to do a similar study with pistachios. > > Michael Sylvester,PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. Department of Psychology University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
