Title: Re: ID ruling
At 12:07 AM -0600 12/30/05, jim guinee wrote:
I at least have read enough to know that there are plenty of scientists out
there, non-religious ones, who find many flaws with evolution, but
those like Dawkins who scream it's a FACT shout down and intimidate
those who disagree.

No contradiction here.
There are many biologists who find weaknesses in particular mechanisms proposed to account for evolution (such as the many varieties of natural selection and genetic drift), but this does not prevent them from accepting evolution itself as a demonstrated fact.
-- 
The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that people believe in it.

* PAUL K. BRANDON                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* Psychology Dept               Minnesota State University  *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001     ph 507-389-6217  *
*        http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html        *

---

You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to