I think
there is material that is not acceptable in our disciplines. For example, intelligent
design does not belong in a biology class, nor does the holocaust as a hoax
belong in a history class Gary J. Klatsky, Ph. D. Director, Human Computer Interaction M.A. Program Department of Psychology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oswego State University (SUNY) http://www.oswego.edu/~klatsky 7060 State Hwy 104W Voice:
(315) 312-3474 Oswego, NY 13126
Fax: (315) 312-6330 -----Original
Message----- Martin, I
meant no slight. I sought a clarification, but you answered the
question. Do I detect a potential bias of what the professor deems
acceptable or unacceptable psychology. If that’s the case, then there’s a
subjectivism in the teaching of psych. Of course, that’s true in any
discipline as we select out what to present and determine what schools of
thought we accept or reject. The example,
however, you use in my field doesn’t wash since the short story is fictional
prose and would be discussed in an English class.. Make it a good
day. --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology &... Louis Schmier
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Gary Klatsky
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Wendi K. Born
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Louis Schmier
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Gary Klatsky
- Re: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Jeffry Ricker
- Re: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Jeffry Ricker
- RE: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Louis Schmier
- Re: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Jeffry Ricker
- Re: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Robin Abrahams
- Re: Mind, Body, Spirit in Clinical Psychology ... Annette Taylor, Ph. D.