Nancy Melucci wrote: I thought that Dawkins' book made just the opposite point - it is right to challenge the belief in god and it is right to do so based on evidence.иа Dawkins presents a strong case that the arguments in support of the existence (however conceived) of god are faulty and, most important, that there is no credible evidence that god exists.иа Although you can't prove non-existence, the preponderance of evidence goes against the belief in god.иа Beliefs held in the absence of evidence (in this case, a belief in god) are delusions. Are you saying we shouldn't challenge delusions?иа Why not? . . . JD Thompson Sheridan Institute Oakville, Ontario --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english |
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Michael Scoles
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Drnanjo
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Louis Schmier
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe msylvester
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Ken Steele
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Paul Brandon
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jim Clark
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Louis Schmier
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jan Thompson
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Louis Schmier
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Beth Benoit
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Paul Brandon
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jim Clark
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Michael Sylvester
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Michael Scoles
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jim Guinee
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jim Guinee
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Jim Guinee
- [tips] Re: It's what they believe Louis Schmier