Nancy Melucci wrote:
It would be wrong to challenge the belief in God, since such things are not done based on evidence.
I thought that Dawkins' book made just the opposite point - it is right to challenge the belief in god and it is right to do so based on evidence.иа
Dawkins presents a strong case that the arguments in support of the existence (however conceived) of god are faulty and, most important, that there is no credible evidence that god exists.иа
Although you can't prove non-existence, the preponderance of evidence goes against the belief in god.иа Beliefs held in the absence of evidence (in this case, a belief in god) are delusions.
Are you saying we shouldn't challenge delusions?иа Why not?
. . . JD Thompson
Sheridan Institute
Oakville, Ontario
---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to