Just a small point in this discussion. Even we, as good scientists, fall into the trap of calling Freud's (and Piaget's for that matter, and a whole host of others) theories, "theories" when in fact, if they cannot be falsified they cannot be legitimately called "theories". As such I think we need a better term: speculation, hypothesis, framework--I like framework for nice bodies of work that are still not large enough (sufficiently integrative?) to be called "theories," such as levels of processing or encoding specificity.
Just my early morning thinking on this. Annette Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 619-260-4006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
