I see only retrospective analyses, a lack of sound theory, and no substantive development in the years since its development. Good for pop-psychologizing after the fact but very little sound work has come from it. I don't think it is adequate to the study of actual group processes. Again, it is more popular than scientifically respectable---like most of the stuff in Personality theories texts. Gary Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D. Professor, Psychology Saginaw Valley State University University Center, MI 48710 989-964-4491 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
