Hi It probably does not help that several highly regarded figures in psychology are cited in support of learning styles, like Sternberg (Thinking Styles, or Intellectual Styles or Mental Self Government) and Gardner (Multiple Intelligences). See:
http://www.learnativity.com/learningstyles.html or the description of Zhang & Sternberg's (2006) recent book: http://books.google.ca/books?id=8oIxZhQ7irsC Further complicating matters, Nisbett and colleagues's work on culture and cognition would appear compatible with much of the earlier literature on learning or cognitive styles. See: http://web.mit.edu/~sdavies/MacData/afs.course.lockers/6/6.969/OldFiles/www/readings/culture_thought.pdf Or is the notion of Learning Styles being criticized here distinct from these perhaps more general efforts? Take care Jim James M. Clark Professor of Psychology 204-786-9757 204-774-4134 Fax j.cl...@uwinnipeg.ca >>> Michael Smith <tipsl...@gmail.com> 29-Mar-09 10:15:34 PM >>> I have been aware for some time that learning styles do not exist (except perhaps as mentioned: a set of previously learned techniques). However, it does seem to be part of the culture now (like the Mozart effect) and it may be too late to turn the tide. Especially since, I have heard many instances of it being promoted by educators or those selling products (such as concept diagrams for visual learners). Not that concept diagrams are not useful, but it seems only "visual learners" can get the most from them by definition. I have also had little luck on convincing anyone that learning styles (and the Mozart effect) do not exist (as they are commonly understood). Oh well. --Mike --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu) --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
