John Kulig said:
"Speaking of which, just read Leonard Mlodinow's The Drunkard's Walk: How 
randomness rules our lives, in which he cites repeated failures of people to 
distinguish different vodkas and wines in blind taste tests. So I buy wine in a 
box with less embarassment these days"

John- I am also reading The Drunkard's Walk. Haven't quite gotten to that part 
of the book but I'm familiar with some of the "research" on vodka and wine 
comparison. I think most shows something a bit different than what Mlodinow 
seems to be saying but your point is well taken about the placebo effects (can 
one separate those placebo effects we normally think about from the ones caused 
by more direct manipulation and snobbery, for example). Either way, I admit 
being somewhat guilty of such snobbery in drink choices- but I also know there 
are tremendous individual differences in tasting ability (and that most of us 
are, of course, on the less than one SD above the mean or worse category so 
we'd never find those truly subtle differences!). But I enjoy playing the 
compare and contrast game with my own "stash" too much to give up "the good 
stuff". We playfully do blind tests sometimes, for example. Not scientific but 
we are reasonably careful about it. When I find I cannot differentiate or 
prefer the cheaper stuff that ends my loyalty to a brand. For example, I quit 
buying more expensive Scotchs when I clearly demonstrated a preference for 
MaCallan 12 year old over any other.   My only "real message" in response to 
your comment is that I think you have truly hit the nail on the head- the whole 
point is *personal enjoyment*. So if box wine is good for you and the bottled 
placebo juice isn't any better that would certainly be folly to pay the extra. 

Even more difficult to understand to me, however, is the snobbery that I see in 
a couple of folks who have actually told me they can't tell the difference 
between the swill others drink and their own choices- clearly they are drinking 
what they do for appearance sake.  I suspect without much data that this is a 
more prevailing trend than might be comfortable to admit. But it does get 
worse. I know a few such drinkers who have confided in me that they actually 
prefer and drink the cheap stuff in private but only drink the more expensive 
wine or spirits in public for "image" sake. I'm not exactly sure how this 
admission is supposed to impress, btw. It does puzzle though. :)
Tim


_______________________________
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Professor and Chair Department of Psychology
The College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
email: [email protected]

teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and 
systems

"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." Dorothy Parker

________________________________________
From: John Kulig [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:44 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] PLEASE NOTE : NEW  FEATURE

Embarassing moment: first day of classes, first real job right after a 2 year 
post doc. Had syllabi run off and found the room, walked in, and discovered I 
had no idea what to say. A deer-in-the-headlights moment, the mind was totally 
blank. So I excused myself non-verbally, went to the bathroom, came back in 5 
minutes, and things started to get better. I probably have more but they may be 
repressed and I need some time to retrieve them ...

Oh, alcohol .. I used to be a fan of Stoli and also German QmP reisling wine. 
Since I am now paying my daughter;s tuition I have switched to Wella red wine 
in a box :~) Speaking of which, just read Leonard Mlodinow's The Drunkard's 
Walk: How randomness rules our lives, in which he cites repeated failures of 
people to distinguish different vodkas and wines in blind taste tests. So I buy 
wine in a box with less embarassment these days

--------------------------
John W. Kulig
Professor of Psychology
Plymouth State University
Plymouth NH 03264
--------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "DeVolder Carol L" <[email protected]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2009 9:26:01 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [tips] PLEASE NOTE : NEW  FEATURE

My choices would be Stoli, Grey Goose, or Tanqueray...
But that's not why I'm writing. While on the thought of "teachable moments" I 
wanted to ask a favor of Tipsters. I have been thinking for some time now about 
compiling a collection of "most embarassing teaching moments." It seems to me 
that when I hear about these I somehow feel more encouraged about my own 
stellar (or not so stellar) moments. I generally get the feeling that if 
someone can do THAT and walk away smiling, then I can handle my own goofs or 
gaffs. I admit I tend to be insecure (I'm sure there's a better term for it), 
but I thought it might be a useful collection for educators new to the 
classroom. To that end, would Tipsters be willing to share (privately or 
publicly) some of their own moments? I'd be happy to keep things confidential 
if so desired. I'd also appreciate any suggestions on such a compilation.
Thanks,
Carol



Carol L. DeVolder, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Psychology
St. Ambrose University
518 West Locust Street
Davenport, Iowa 52803

Phone: 563-333-6482
e-mail: [email protected]
web: http://web.sau.edu/psychology/psychfaculty/cdevolder.htm

The contents of this message are confidential and may not be shared with anyone 
without permission of the sender.



-----Original Message-----
From: Shearon, Tim [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thu 8/6/2009 1:00 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] PLEASE NOTE : NEW  FEATURE



Harry Harlow's problems with the tiny molecule are well documented. Rum and 
Coca-cola - that's so graduate school- though I do admit that Bullfighters were 
my preference. :) I much prefer a single malt (18 year old Highland Park), a 
good bourbon (Woodford Reserve is a good starting point), or Tequila (Patron 
Respasado is fine with me!). With food, wine or beer depending on the fare. 
Only in moderation!!
Hope you have a great Thursday!!
Tim
_______________________________
Timothy O. Shearon, PhD
Professor and Chair Department of Psychology
The College of Idaho
Caldwell, ID 83605
email: [email protected]

teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and 
systems

"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." Dorothy Parker

________________________________________
From: michael sylvester [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:31 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] PLEASE NOTE : NEW  FEATURE

Effective this Friday,I will be introducing a new feature for 
tipsters-"Teachable moment" Friday. All tipsters are encouraged to contribute.I 
will provide gin and tonic and the rum and coca-cola.
Btw,while on this subject,I am curious as to  the favorite libations of 
Skinner,Watson,Freud(smoked dope),G Stanley Hall,Christopher Green,Stephen 
Black , and Mary Carver Jones. Who was the alcoholic-Harlow or Mowrer? Did 
Obama get his "hope" idea from Mowrer?

Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to