YES! 

We are undergoing program review this year with WASC accreditation looming for 
early next year and it has helped us TREMENDOUSLY in reframing our student 
learning outcomes and goals and potential assessments.

We used to have what we called 7 goals and 40+ outcomes only but we now realize 
that what we called goals were really the outcomes and the 40+ outcomes were 
really potential assessments. We now realize that we have two goals broadly 
categorized as skills and content knowledge and our goals are driven by the 
blueprint for the future of the discipline. Our assessment were also driven by 
that.

Annette

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
619-260-4006
tay...@sandiego.edu


---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:44:03 -0500 (EST)
>From: Gerald Peterson <peter...@vmail.svsu.edu>  
>Subject: Re: [tips] Book Group: Undergraduate Education in Psychology  
>To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <tips@acsun.frostburg.edu>
>
>
>Have there been any reviews of this?  Anyone find it relevant or useful in 
>dept. assessment discussions? Gary 
>
>
>
>
>Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D. 
>Professor, Department of Psychology 
>Saginaw Valley State University 
>University Center, MI 48710 
>989-964-4491 
>peter...@svsu.edu 
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sue Frantz" <sfra...@highline.edu>
>To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <tips@acsun.frostburg.edu>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:44:45 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>Subject: [tips] Book Group: Undergraduate Education in Psychology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi all, 
>
>
>
>The Undergraduate Education in Psychology book group met last month to discuss 
>chapter 1. After introductions, the group discussed our general observations 
>and thoughts regarding the chapter. In order to achieve psychological 
>literacy, students must be prepared to do the work, and psychology courses 
>must be well-taught. What does a well-taught course look like? How do we 
>educate people as to what psychology is and is not? What should we teach in 
>Intro Psych, the only psychology course most students will ever take? 
>
>
>
>Would you like to join us for the live discussion of chapter 2? We meet online 
>the third Wednesday of the month at 7pm ET/4pm PT. All you need is a 
>Java-enabled browser. A microphone would be a nice addition – it’s easier to 
>talk than type. We use Elluminate. Email me off-list for the link: 
>sfra...@highline.edu 
>
>
>
>If you can’t make the live discussions but would still like to discuss the 
>book (one chapter each month), you’re welcome to join our Google Group for 
>asynchronous discussion: http://groups.google.com/group/undergradpsych To 
>join, you’ll need to ‘apply for membership.’ The threshold for membership is 
>pretty low; I just need to believe you’re human. =) 
>
>
>
>Don’t have the book yet? Order it here: 
>http://books.apa.org/books.cfm?id=4316115&toc=yes 
>
>
>
>If you have any questions, drop me an email. 
>
>
>
>Best, 
>Sue 
>
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Sue Frantz Highline Community College 
>Psychology, Coordinator Des Moines, WA 
>206.878.3710 x3404 sfra...@highline.edu 
>
>Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology, Associate Director 
>
>Project Syllabus 
>
>APA Division 2: Society for the Teaching of Psychology 
>
>
>
>APA's p...@cc Committee 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--- 
>To make changes to your subscription contact: 
>
>Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu) 
>
>---
>To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
>Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)

Reply via email to