I'm glad you're laughing, Beth! Please don't have your feelings hurt by our spam detection system. I'm just trying to figure out why this happens with your posts. I most definitely do not consider your posts to be junk! I have no idea what's going on here. Again, apologies that the term "junk mail" appeared in my reply.
John -- John Serafin Psychology Department Saint Vincent College Latrobe, PA 15650 john.sera...@email.stvincent.edu From: Beth Benoit <beth.ben...@gmail.com> Reply-To: TIPS posts <tips@acsun.frostburg.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:14:35 -0500 To: TIPS posts <tips@acsun.frostburg.edu> Subject: Re: [tips] Name that word I'm laughing, but my feelings are also hurt. Junk mail??? Wow. I may need to tune up academic, scholarly postings. Beth Benoit On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Serafin, John <john.sera...@email.stvincent.edu> wrote: Ah, sorry for the grammatical errors in that. And, more importantly, apologies to Beth on the *** JUNK MAIL *** designation in the subject line. Our system tags suspected junk mail. I have no idea why your mail almost always shows up that way, but if I reply, the reply includes that in the subject line. Not intentional on my part. Anybody have any idea of why that would happen with Beth's emails? We use Barracuda filtering software here. I turned off filtering, but it still tags messages in this way. John --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
