Hi all,
The problem is universal and related not only to
psychology lectures but also to others:
I have a problem in grading students; that is, most of
the students (if not all) study for taking "A"s "B"s .. etc. and most of them
are ready for getting "C" if you gurantee that nobody wants them to do things
for the lecture.
More importantly, I believed that there are unneglible
amount of students with very high motivation and effort. Unfortunately, I am not
sure that by concentrating on "bad" students I loose the contact with "good"
students or not. In other words, I want "good" students to get "A"s and "B"s and
want "bad" students to get "F"s. ... And the question:
Does it sound good for you that I will give "A" and "A-"
for the (let's say) top %5 of the students wherease give "F" and "D"s for the
last %5 regardless of their actual score on the lecture.
I know this curve mechanism can be stresfull for most of the students but I
wonder by this method I could discriminate "bad"s from "good"s.
Thank your for your comments.
Dogan Kokdemir, M.Sc.
Baskent University
Ankara - Turkey
|
- Re: Grading & Motivation Dogan Kokdemir
- Re: Grading & Motivation Dr. Barbara Watters
- Grading & Motivation Stephen Black
- Re: Grading & Motivation Stephen Black
- Re: Grading & Motivation Mike Scoles
- Re: Grading & Motivation Jean Edwards
- Re: Grading & Motivation Paul Brandon
- Re: Grading & Motivation Mike Scoles
- Re: Grading & Motivation Michael J. Kane
- Re: Grading & Motivation RICHARD PISACRETA
- Re: Grading & Motivation Jim Clark