Thanks for the replies. Mike: As always, a comprehensive reply!
I think I was concerned about this looking like "padding." I know that it is completely unacceptable to publish a paper based on exactly the same data as if it were two different studies but I wasn't sure about basically the same data in two venues such as a presentation and publication. I myself have presented bits and pieces that later became an article when they were all unified. But I have not published almost exactly the same study. Usually the presentation came first, so that I could get feedback before submitting for publication. Of course, I have not seen the presentation in question, and you make a great point about the time constraints of a presentation--hardly able to put together anything as comprehensive as a good journal article. On the other hand, single study publications could be "mostly" presented within an hour time slot. So I guess in the end it's sometimes a judgement call--or we need to make it clear on our vita. Along with everything else we try to teach in terms of doing research, I'm trying to teach my student good ethics and habits; so before giving her advice (she asked me for the advice), I wanted to check on what tipsters think. Annette Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. Professor, Psychological Sciences University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 tay...@sandiego.edu<mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu> --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=4004 or send a blank email to leave-4004-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
