Chris wrote "Which is precisely why it doesn't count as a candidate for knowledge (for anyone remotely sympathetic to Popper)."
I think I would agree that the statment wouldn't count as a scientific hypothesis, but not that it couldn't count as knowledge. To say that assumes a scientific world view where the falsifiability thing is king. It is conceivable, though, that one can have true knowledge without such knowledge being falsifyable in the least. --Mike --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5841 or send a blank email to leave-5841-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
