Hi all:
I would suggest both issues are problems. But I do have a dog in this
fight* ;-)
Ken
*Steele, K. M. (2013). Failure to replicate the Mehta and Zhu (2009)
color-priming effect on anagram solution times. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0548-3
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph. D. steel...@appstate.edu
Professor
Department of Psychology http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 1/16/2014 3:12 PM, Christopher Green wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:27 PM, "Mike Palij" <m...@nyu.edu
<mailto:m...@nyu.edu>> wrote:
(1) One thing this pattern implies is that peer-review is broken in
some significant way. It is not catching those articles that should
not be published
It seems to me that you're expecting from peer review things that it was
never designed to catch -- outright fraud as opposed to poor conception,
methodology, execution, or interpretation. Indeed, given that the
fraudsters know all about the peer review process, it is likely that the
fraud was designed specifically to evade peer review's probable grasp.
-----
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M6C 1G4
Canada
chri...@yorku.ca <mailto:chri...@yorku.ca>
---
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@jab.org.
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=32811
or send a blank email to
leave-32811-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
