Hi Miguel:
here is the citation:
​Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2017). Reducing students’ misconceptions
with refutational teaching: For long-term retention, verbal ability
matters. *Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in
Psychology, *No Pagination Specified.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000082
<http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/stl0000082>

​
​This goes along with some other studies that show that if you diminish
processing resources in any way during a retraction of misinformation, you
are unlikely to succeed with the retraction. Whatever you say first, is
what sticks.

In psychology this sort of goes along with very many findings where someone
makes a splashy finding and then no one can replicate it but the finding
makes it into textbooks and psychological lore. Sigh.

So, first of all: if you want to change students' prior misconceptions you
have to address them. But the trick is not to OVERdo addressing the
misconception, and not start with the misconception because once students
hear it they stop processing. The trick is that you have to mention the
misconception because JUST telling what is right never gets at removing the
prior misinformation. The two pieces of information live happily together
in memory, (c.f., people behave more unusually during a full moon along
with what you tell them in class that this is confirmation bias that is fun
but unsupported by studies that show no differences in arrest numbers or
emergency room activity; however, a slight uptick during a new moon, when
it's darker out so (a) criminals are less visible and (b) people stumble
around in the dark and hurt themselves) and since misconceptions are more
likely to be repeated and become familiarized, so you must bring up the
misconception BRIEFLY and refute. Avoid focusing too much on the
misconception, as that again makes it familiar. It helps to start with a
warning: You may have heard some people say that.... and then just mention
it briefly and tell students WHY it's wrong. A lot of this goes along with
some of the literature on persuasion in general. So start with why right =
right; brief myth; then go with why wrong = wrong.

As soon as there is a full release, I will post a website url for a global
organization that is going to provide resources to debunk all kinds of
scientific babble and ways to combat the post-truth world.

Annette​

Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 921210
tay...@sandiego.edu

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
(TIPS) digest <tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu> wrote:

> TIPS Digest for Sunday, June 18, 2017.
>
> 1. RE: Re:
> ​​
> tips digest: June 16, 2017
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: RE: Re:tips digest: June 16, 2017
> From: Miguel Roig <ro...@stjohns.edu>
> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:31:10 +0000
> X-Message-Number: 1
>
> Annette, I think you are correct about publishing in top-tier journals,
> but the science publishing industry is rapidly evolving (devolving?) and
> other publishing models have appeared (PLOS, eLife (
> https://elifesciences.org/about), F1000research (
> https://f1000research.com/) that give authors more control over their
> work and that may ultimately pose a challenge to the status quo.
>
> BTW, I was curious in Mike's question and found the following blurb dated
> from 2014: "The sale and licensing of APA publications and databases is by
> far the largest source of revenue, generating nearly $86 million annually",
> http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/ceo.aspx.
>
> Back to Annette: Could you tell us more about what you published?
> Inquiring minds want to know!
>
> Miguel
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Annette Taylor [tay...@sandiego.edu]
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 6:58 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re:[tips] tips digest: June 16, 2017
>
> I just published a paper in a APA journal this month and was told that I
> could post the final page proofs but not a PDF of the article. I have all
> my career faced the reality that my work is not MY work. If I want to
> publish in a top tier or mainstream journal I have to give away my work,
> for free, so someone else can make lots of money from it. This contributes
> to the general societal misperception that we academics are all rich from
> all the royalties we get from our publications. Hahahahahahahaha.
>
> Annette
>
> Sent from my iPad
> So no signature lines
>
> > On Jun 15, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> (TIPS) digest <tips@fsulist.frostburg.edu> wrote:
> >
> > TIPS Digest for Friday, June 16, 2017.
> >
> > 1. Take Down That Article! Love, APA
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Take Down That Article! Love, APA
> > From: "Mike Palij" <m...@nyu.edu>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:49:01 -0400
> > X-Message-Number: 1
> >
> > Publish and being bullied about it.  Out APA is telling authors of
> > its journal article that they have to take the published versions of
> > their published journal articles.  Yes, we have to agree to give
> > APA the copyright and control over the final product but some
> > of this is getting tiresome.  For more on this point, see the following
> > article:
> >
> > http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49670/
> title/Authors-Peeved-by-APA-s-Article-Takedown-Pilot/
> >
> > By the way, does anybody know how much money APA makes
> > per published article?
> >
> > -Mike Palij
> > New York University
> > m...@nyu.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > END OF DIGEST
> >
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to tips as: tay...@sandiego.edu
> > To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13534.
> 4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21b0&n=T&l=tips&o=50939
> > or send a blank email to leave-50939-13534.
> 4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: ro...@stjohns.edu.
> To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=1632838.
> 7e62b84813297f170a6fc240dab8c12d&n=T&l=tips&o=50943
> or send a blank email to leave-50943-1632838.
> 7e62b84813297f170a6fc240dab8c...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>
>
>
> ---
>
> END OF DIGEST
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: tay...@sandiego.edu
> To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13534.
> 4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21b0&n=T&l=tips&o=50950
> or send a blank email to leave-50950-13534.4204dc3a11678c6b1d0be57cfe0a21
> b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: arch...@mail-archive.com.
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=50956
or send a blank email to 
leave-50956-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to